It isn't any easier to rig an election with a computer than it is with ballots. Same principles, with the same checks and verifications. If someone did something nasty, prosecute them with evidence. The code will tell you very quickly and easily.
Besides, now that the democrats won the closely contested House and Senate races in Ohio, and no one complained about electronic voter fraud during the last election, the problem has already been solved! Or, was there ever a problem?
Conspiracy theories are always fun, and often truth is stranger than fiction. But if a Wendy's employee who used to be a McDonald's employee testifies against a McDonald's employee claiming that McDonalds is trying to kill everyone and he is a food prep expert and he knows it can be done and he talked to the McDonald's manager who hinted that he wanted everyone dead but he never actually participated in or saw any poisoning take place--(breath)--then a major question is "why did they tell you all this if you aren't in cahoots?"
If someone did something, then they need more evidence than a guy who says it is possible and the fact that your preferred party didn't win in that particular election. And if they did it, it is a criminal case (not a show panel). And if they did it then I hope they get the evidence they need--and then I will get outraged.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhoa! Scandalous! Outrageous!
ReplyDeleteAnd silly.
It isn't any easier to rig an election with a computer than it is with ballots. Same principles, with the same checks and verifications. If someone did something nasty, prosecute them with evidence. The code will tell you very quickly and easily.
Besides, now that the democrats won the closely contested House and Senate races in Ohio, and no one complained about electronic voter fraud during the last election, the problem has already been solved! Or, was there ever a problem?
Conspiracy theories are always fun, and often truth is stranger than fiction. But if a Wendy's employee who used to be a McDonald's employee testifies against a McDonald's employee claiming that McDonalds is trying to kill everyone and he is a food prep expert and he knows it can be done and he talked to the McDonald's manager who hinted that he wanted everyone dead but he never actually participated in or saw any poisoning take place--(breath)--then a major question is "why did they tell you all this if you aren't in cahoots?"
If someone did something, then they need more evidence than a guy who says it is possible and the fact that your preferred party didn't win in that particular election. And if they did it, it is a criminal case (not a show panel). And if they did it then I hope they get the evidence they need--and then I will get outraged.